← All themes

Human Oversight across ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF and the EU AI Act

// theme · human-oversight

Human Oversight

Open in explorer →

Meaningful human control and ability to intervene or override.

// Do once → satisfies all three
ONE documented oversight protocol - named reviewers, intervention UI, stop-the-line, override audit log.

A real protocol with logs is the only way to evidence oversight; ticking 'human in the loop' on a deck satisfies none of the three.

ISO 42001
Annex A.9
NIST AI RMF
MAP 5.2 · MANAGE 2.3
EU AI Act
Art.14 · Art.26
// Evidence auditors expect
  • Documented override / stop-the-line procedure
  • Trained reviewer roster with sign-off authority
  • UI evidence of meaningful intervention points (not rubber-stamp)
  • Logs proving overrides were possible AND used
// Common pitfalls
  • 'Human in the loop' that only clicks Approve on 1000 items/day - automation bias = no oversight.
  • Overrides technically possible but operationally discouraged or unreviewed.
  • Reviewers not trained on the failure modes they're meant to catch.